5 minute information

From Freiheit statt Angst!

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Current revision (14:37, 22 August 2010) (edit) (undo)
 
(8 intermediate revisions not shown.)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
5-minute information: Data retention
+
5-Minute Overview: German Data Retention Law
-
According to plans of the German parties CDU, CSU and SPD, from 2008 onwards it will be possible to trace who has contacted whom via either telephone, mobile phone or e-mail for a period of six months. In the case of mobile calls or text messages via mobile phone the user's location will also be logged. Anonymising services will be prohibited.
+
According to a law passed by the German parties CDU, CSU, and SPD, from 2008 on it will be possible to trace who has contacted a person using the telephone, mobile phone or e-mail for a period of six months. In the case of mobile calls or text messages on mobile phones, the user's location will also be logged. Anonymising services will be prohibited.
-
The data that will be collected about the entire population will allow our movements to be traced, any calls or communications with business contacts to be monitored and will remove privacy in our personal relationships. It also allows the the content of communications to be analysed such as personal interests and the individual life circumstances of the person communicating. Access to the data is to be granted to the police, public prosecutors, secret services and foreign states which hope for better prosecution of crimes.
+
The data that will be collected about the entire population will allow our movements to be traced, any calls or communications with personal and business contacts to be monitored, and will remove privacy from our personal and business relationships. Information regarding the content of communications can be deduced relating to personal interests and the individual life circumstances of the people communicating. Access to the data is to be granted to police, public prosecutors, secret services, and foreign states under the pretext of better prosecution of crimes.
-
At present, telecommunications providers may retain only data required for billing purposes. This is not the case with location data and information regarding e-mails, for example. Customers can request the deletion of billing data as soon as the monthly invoice has been sent out. By using a flat rate, one can prevent the collection of traffic data altogether, which can be important for journalists, counsellors and others.
+
At present, telecommunications providers may only retain data required for billing purposes. This is not the case with location data and information regarding e-mails, for example. Customers can request the deletion of billing data as soon as the monthly invoice has been sent out. By using a flat rate, you can prevent the collection of traffic data altogether, which can be important for journalists, counselors and others.
-
What is the Problem?
+
-
The current plans regarding the collection of information about citizens' communication, movements and use of media constitute the greatest threat yet to our right to an independent and private life.
+
'''What is the Problem?'''
-
We would all suffer from data retention:
+
The current plans regarding the collection of information about communication of citizens' movements, and use of media constitute the greatest threat yet to our right for an independent and private life.
-
* Data retention constitutes an excessive invasion into our personal privacy.
+
We will all suffer from unregulated data retention:
-
* Data retention disrupts professional activities (e.g. in the fields of medicine, law, clergy, journalism) as well as political and business activities that rely on discretion. It ultimately harms our free society itself.
+
 
-
* Data retention doesn't prevent terrorism or crime. It is unnecessary and can easily be circumvented by criminals.
+
* Data retention constitutes an excessive invasion of our personal privacy.
 +
* Data retention disrupts professional activities (e.g. in the fields of medicine, law, clergy, journalism, etc.) as well as political and business activities that rely on the confidentiality of communications. It ultimately harms and undermines the freedom of our society itself.
 +
* Data retention doesn't prevent terrorism or crime. It is unnecessary, as it can easily be circumvented by criminals.
* Data retention violates the human right to privacy and informational self-determination.
* Data retention violates the human right to privacy and informational self-determination.
-
* Data retention puts a financial strain both on businesses and consumers.
+
* Data retention puts a financial strain on both businesses and consumers.
-
* Data retention discriminates against users of telephone, mobile phone and internet services in comparison to other means of communication.
+
* Data retention discriminates against people using telephones, mobile/cell phones and internet services, as compared to people using other means of communication.
-
Current situation
+
'''Current situation'''
-
The German Federal Minister of Justice, Brigitte Zypries, is currently pushing a draft bill concerning the introduction of data retention in Germany. The Bundestag (German parliament) is to vote on the bill in autumn. The plans are supported by the governing parties CDU, CSU and SPD. But there is an increasing tendency, also in politics, to at least delay data retention until the European Court has ruled on its legality.
+
The ruling conservative and social democrat parties have passed the law concerning the introduction of data retention in Germany. It is scheduled to take effect on January 1, 2008. As soon as the law is promulgated, we will file a complaint with the Federal Constitutional Court.
-
Whether or not data retention can be averted greatly depends on public pressure.
+
'''Act now:'''
-
Act now:
+
-
* Change the minds of SPD, CDU and CSU MEPs
 
-
* Take part in the class action suit against data retention
 
-
* Sign the appeal "SPD, CDU and CSU against data retention"
 
* Participate in the "Arbeitskreis Vorratsdatenspeicherung" (German Work Group on Data Retention)
* Participate in the "Arbeitskreis Vorratsdatenspeicherung" (German Work Group on Data Retention)
-
* Other ways of acting
+
* Other means of action...
Read more:
Read more:

Current revision

5-Minute Overview: German Data Retention Law

According to a law passed by the German parties CDU, CSU, and SPD, from 2008 on it will be possible to trace who has contacted a person using the telephone, mobile phone or e-mail for a period of six months. In the case of mobile calls or text messages on mobile phones, the user's location will also be logged. Anonymising services will be prohibited.

The data that will be collected about the entire population will allow our movements to be traced, any calls or communications with personal and business contacts to be monitored, and will remove privacy from our personal and business relationships. Information regarding the content of communications can be deduced relating to personal interests and the individual life circumstances of the people communicating. Access to the data is to be granted to police, public prosecutors, secret services, and foreign states under the pretext of better prosecution of crimes.

At present, telecommunications providers may only retain data required for billing purposes. This is not the case with location data and information regarding e-mails, for example. Customers can request the deletion of billing data as soon as the monthly invoice has been sent out. By using a flat rate, you can prevent the collection of traffic data altogether, which can be important for journalists, counselors and others.

What is the Problem?

The current plans regarding the collection of information about communication of citizens' movements, and use of media constitute the greatest threat yet to our right for an independent and private life.

We will all suffer from unregulated data retention:

  • Data retention constitutes an excessive invasion of our personal privacy.
  • Data retention disrupts professional activities (e.g. in the fields of medicine, law, clergy, journalism, etc.) as well as political and business activities that rely on the confidentiality of communications. It ultimately harms and undermines the freedom of our society itself.
  • Data retention doesn't prevent terrorism or crime. It is unnecessary, as it can easily be circumvented by criminals.
  • Data retention violates the human right to privacy and informational self-determination.
  • Data retention puts a financial strain on both businesses and consumers.
  • Data retention discriminates against people using telephones, mobile/cell phones and internet services, as compared to people using other means of communication.

Current situation

The ruling conservative and social democrat parties have passed the law concerning the introduction of data retention in Germany. It is scheduled to take effect on January 1, 2008. As soon as the law is promulgated, we will file a complaint with the Federal Constitutional Court.

Act now:

  • Participate in the "Arbeitskreis Vorratsdatenspeicherung" (German Work Group on Data Retention)
  • Other means of action...

Read more:

  • Latest news
  • Background information on data retention
  • Pros and cons of data retention
  • More information and resources
Personal tools
Toolbox
  • What links here
  • Related changes
  • Upload file
  • Special pages
  • Printable version