DR-FAQ: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
Zur Navigation springen
Zur Suche springen
(Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: It is important for us all (including members that aren't involved yet) to have a very clear message on all common questions and - above all - avoid contradicting ourse...) |
|||
| Zeile 1: | Zeile 1: | ||
| − | It is important for us all (including members that aren't involved yet) to have a very clear message on all common questions and - above all - avoid contradicting ourselves! We are preparing an "faq" initially for internal use and subsequently to use as lobby material for the Parliament. | + | It is important for us all (including members that aren't involved yet) to have a very clear message on all common questions and - above all - avoid contradicting ourselves! We are preparing an "faq" initially for internal use and subsequently to use as lobby material for the Parliament, journalists, politicians, activists, etc., like the one on SWIFT - |
| + | http://www.edri.org/faq-2-swift-agreement-edri. | ||
==Does data retention help to cut crime?== | ==Does data retention help to cut crime?== | ||
| Zeile 5: | Zeile 6: | ||
==Are there alternatives to data retention?== | ==Are there alternatives to data retention?== | ||
| − | ==What does | + | ==What does civil society propose as an alternative?== |
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
[http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/content/view/83/87/lang,en/ Arguments of Data Retention advocates critically discussed] | [http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/content/view/83/87/lang,en/ Arguments of Data Retention advocates critically discussed] | ||
| + | |||
[http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/content/view/363/158/lang,en/ Joint letter to Commission] | [http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/content/view/363/158/lang,en/ Joint letter to Commission] | ||
Version vom 20. September 2010, 07:15 Uhr
It is important for us all (including members that aren't involved yet) to have a very clear message on all common questions and - above all - avoid contradicting ourselves! We are preparing an "faq" initially for internal use and subsequently to use as lobby material for the Parliament, journalists, politicians, activists, etc., like the one on SWIFT - http://www.edri.org/faq-2-swift-agreement-edri.