DR-FAQ: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus Freiheit statt Angst!
Zur Navigation springen Zur Suche springen
Zeile 9: Zeile 9:
  
 
==Would an optional approach not fail the objective of harmonization?==
 
==Would an optional approach not fail the objective of harmonization?==
 +
 +
==Would Council accept an optional approach?==
  
 
==See also==
 
==See also==

Version vom 20. September 2010, 20:26 Uhr

It is important for us all (including members that aren't involved yet) to have a very clear message on all common questions and - above all - avoid contradicting ourselves! We are preparing an "faq" initially for internal use and subsequently to use as lobby material for the Parliament, journalists, politicians, activists, etc., like the one on SWIFT - http://www.edri.org/faq-2-swift-agreement-edri.

Does data retention help to cut crime?

Are there alternatives to data retention?

What does civil society propose as an alternative?

Would an optional approach not fail the objective of harmonization?

Would Council accept an optional approach?

See also

Arguments of Data Retention advocates critically discussed

Joint letter to Commission