5 minute information: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
Nic (Diskussion | Beiträge) K (5-Minute-Info wurde nach 5 minute information verschoben) |
|
(kein Unterschied)
|
Version vom 25. Oktober 2007, 23:04 Uhr
5-minute information: Data retention
According to plans of the German parties CDU, CSU and SPD, from 2008 onwards it will be possible to trace who has contacted whom via either telephone, mobile phone or e-mail for a period of six months. In the case of mobile calls or text messages via mobile phone the user's location will also be logged. Anonymising services will be prohibited.
The data that will be collected about the entire population will allow our movements to be traced, any calls or communications with business contacts to be monitored and will remove privacy in our personal relationships. It also allows the the content of communications to be analysed such as personal interests and the individual life circumstances of the person communicating. Access to the data is to be granted to the police, public prosecutors, secret services and foreign states which hope for better prosecution of crimes.
At present, telecommunications providers may retain only data required for billing purposes. This is not the case with location data and information regarding e-mails, for example. Customers can request the deletion of billing data as soon as the monthly invoice has been sent out. By using a flat rate, one can prevent the collection of traffic data altogether, which can be important for journalists, counsellors and others. What is the Problem?
The current plans regarding the collection of information about citizens' communication, movements and use of media constitute the greatest threat yet to our right to an independent and private life.
We would all suffer from data retention:
- Data retention constitutes an excessive invasion into our personal privacy.
- Data retention disrupts professional activities (e.g. in the fields of medicine, law, clergy, journalism) as well as political and business activities that rely on discretion. It ultimately harms our free society itself.
- Data retention doesn't prevent terrorism or crime. It is unnecessary and can easily be circumvented by criminals.
- Data retention violates the human right to privacy and informational self-determination.
- Data retention puts a financial strain both on businesses and consumers.
- Data retention discriminates against users of telephone, mobile phone and internet services in comparison to other means of communication.
Current situation
The German Federal Minister of Justice, Brigitte Zypries, is currently pushing a draft bill concerning the introduction of data retention in Germany. The Bundestag (German parliament) is to vote on the bill in autumn. The plans are supported by the governing parties CDU, CSU and SPD. But there is an increasing tendency, also in politics, to at least delay data retention until the European Court has ruled on its legality.
Whether or not data retention can be averted greatly depends on public pressure. Act now:
- Change the minds of SPD, CDU and CSU MEPs
- Take part in the class action suit against data retention
- Sign the appeal "SPD, CDU and CSU against data retention"
- Participate in the "Arbeitskreis Vorratsdatenspeicherung" (German Work Group on Data Retention)
- Other ways of acting
Read more:
- Latest news
- Background information on data retention
- Pros and cons of data retention
- More information and resources