DRletter: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus Freiheit statt Angst!
Zur Navigation springen Zur Suche springen
Zeile 45: Zeile 45:
 
#TJ McIntyre for '''Digital Rights Ireland''', Ireland
 
#TJ McIntyre for '''Digital Rights Ireland''', Ireland
 
#Martina Haan for '''DPV Deutscher Presse Verband – Verband für Journalisten e.V.''', Germany
 
#Martina Haan for '''DPV Deutscher Presse Verband – Verband für Journalisten e.V.''', Germany
 +
#Prof. Michael Rotert for '''eco - Association of the German Internet Industry''', Germany
 
#Eleni Alevritou for '''EKPIZO Consumers Association the Quality of Life''', Greece
 
#Eleni Alevritou for '''EKPIZO Consumers Association the Quality of Life''', Greece
 
#Ville Oksanen for '''Electronic Frontier Finland''', Finland
 
#Ville Oksanen for '''Electronic Frontier Finland''', Finland

Version vom 20. Juni 2010, 16:57 Uhr

Recipients

  1. Cecilia Malmström, European Commissioner for Home Affairs, BE-1049 Brussels, Belgium
  2. Viviane Reding, European Commission Vice-President with responsibility for Justice, Fundamental Rights and Citizenship, BE-1049 Brussels, Belgium
  3. Neelie Kroes, European Commission Vice-President with responsibility for the Digital Agenda

Draft text

Dear Commissioners,

The EU data retention directive 2006/24 requires telecommunications companies to store data about all of their customers' communications. Although ostensibly to reduce barriers to the single market, the Directive was proposed as a measure aimed at facilitating criminal investigations. The Directive creates a process for recording details of who communicated with whom via various electronic communications systems. In the case of mobile phone calls and SMS messages, the respective location of the users is also recorded. In combination with other data, Internet usage is also to be made traceable.

We believe that such invasive surveillance of the entire population is unacceptable. With a data retention regime in place, sensitive information about social contacts (including business contacts), movements and the private lives (e.g. contacts with physicians, lawyers, workers councils, psychologists, helplines, etc) of 500 million Europeans is collected in the absence of any suspicion. Telecommunications data retention undermines professional confidentiality, creating the permanent risk of data losses and data abuses and deters citizens from making confidential communications via electronic communication networks. It undermines the protection of journalistic sources and thus compromises the freedom of the press. Overall it damages preconditions of our open and democratic society. In the absence of a financial compensation scheme in most countries, the enormous costs of a telecommunications data retention regime must be borne by the thousands of affected telecommunications providers. This leads to price increases as well as the discontinuation of services, and indirectly burdens consumers.

Studies prove that the communications data available without data retention are generally sufficient for effective criminal investigations. Blanket data retention has proven to be superfluous, harmful or even unconstitutional in many states across Europe, such as Austria, Belgium, Germany, Greece, Romania and Sweden. These states prosecute crime just as effectively using targeted instruments, such as the data preservation regime agreed in the Council of Europe Convention on Cybercrime. There is no proof that telecommunications data retention provides for better protection against crime. On the other hand, we can see that it costs billions of euros, puts the privacy of innocent people at risk, disrupts confidential communications and paves the way for an ever-increasing mass accumulation of information about the entire population.

Legal experts expect the European Court of Justice to follow the Constitutional Court of Romania as well as the European Court of Human Rights's Marper judgement and declare the retention of telecommunications data in the absence of any suspicion incompatible with the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights.

As representatives of the citizens, the media, professionals and industry we collectively reject the Directive on telecommunications data retention. We urge you to propose the repeal of the EU requirements regarding data retention in favour of a system of expedited preservation and targeted collection of traffic data as agreed in the Council of Europe's Convention on Cybercrime. In doing so, please be assured of our support.

Yours faithfully,

Signatories (name, organisation, country)

  1. Gergana Jouleva for the Access to Information Programme, Bulgaria
  2. Terri Dowty for Action on Rights for Children, UK
  3. Rainer Hammerschmidt for Aktion Freiheit statt Angst e.V., Germany
  4. Andrea Monti for ALCEI - Electronic Frontiers Italy, Italy
  5. David Banisar for ARTICLE 19: Global Campaign for Free Expression, UK
  6. Dr. Roland Lemye for Association Belge des Syndicats Médicaux, Belgium
  7. Alen Nanov for the Association for Advising, Treatment, Resocialization and Reintegration of Drug Users and Other Marginalized and Vulnerable Groups IZBOR, Macedonia
  8. Bogdan Manolea for the Association for Technology and Internet - APTI, Romania
  9. Martine Simonis for L'association Générale des Journalistes Professionnels de Belgique (AGJPB), Belgium
  10. Ute Groth for bdfj Bundesvereinigung der Fachjournalisten e.V., Germany
  11. Ot van Daalen for Bits of Freedom, The Netherlands
  12. Gabriele Nicolai for Berufsverband Deutscher Psychologinnen und Psychologen e.V., Germany
  13. Torsten Bultmann for Bund demokratischer Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler e.V., Germany
  14. Marina Jelic for Center for Peace and Democracy Development CPDD, Serbia
  15. Sabiha Husic for Citizens' Association Medica Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  16. Zdenko Duka for the Croatian Journalists' Association CJA, Croatia
  17. Christian Jeitler for Cyber Liberties Union, Austria
  18. Vagn Jelsoe for the Danish Consumer Council, Denmark
  19. Karl Lemmen, Deutsche AIDS-Hilfe e.V., Germany
  20. Ulrich Janßen for Deutsche Journalistinnen- und Journalisten-Union dju in ver.di, Germany
  21. Michael Konken for Deutscher Journalisten-Verband, Germany
  22. Stefanie Severin for DFJV Deutscher Fachjournalisten-Verband AG, Germany
  23. TJ McIntyre for Digital Rights Ireland, Ireland
  24. Martina Haan for DPV Deutscher Presse Verband – Verband für Journalisten e.V., Germany
  25. Prof. Michael Rotert for eco - Association of the German Internet Industry, Germany
  26. Eleni Alevritou for EKPIZO Consumers Association the Quality of Life, Greece
  27. Ville Oksanen for Electronic Frontier Finland, Finland
  28. Thomas Gramstad for Electronic Frontier Norway, Norway
  29. Máté Dániel Szabó for Eötvös Károly Institute, Hungary
  30. Andreas Krisch for European Digital Rights, Europe
  31. Anne Margrethe Lund, European Movement in Norway, Norway
  32. Simona Conservas for exgae, Spain
  33. Stefan Hügel for FIfF - Forum InformatikerInnen für Frieden und gesellschaftliche Verantwortung e.V., Germany
  34. padeluun for FoeBuD e.V., Germany
  35. Beate Ziegler for Forum Menschenrechte, Germany
  36. Stephan Uhlmann for the Foundation for a Free Information Infrastructure (FFII) e.V., Europe
  37. Valentina Pellizzer for Foundation Oneworld - platform for Southeast Europe (owpsee), Bosnia & Herzegovina
  38. Ross Anderson for FIPR Foundation for Information Policy Research, UK
  39. Lutz Donnerhacke for FITUG e.V., Germany
  40. Matthias Kirschner for Free Software Foundation Europe FSFE, Europe
  41. Martin Grauduszus for Freie Ärzteschaft e.V., Germany
  42. Jürgen Wahlmann for GameParents.de e.V., Germany
  43. Christoph Klug for Gesellschaft für Datenschutz und Datensicherheit e.V. (GDD), Germany
  44. Arvind Ganesan for Human Rights Watch, international
  45. Joyce Hes for Humanistisch Verbond, The Netherlands
  46. Sven Lüders for Humanistische Union e.V., Germany
  47. Dr. Balázs Dénes for the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union, Hungary
  48. Jo Glanville for Index on Censorship, UK
  49. Dr. Rolf Gössner for Internationale Liga für Menschenrechte (Berlin), Germany
  50. Rudi Vansnick for Internet Society Belgium, Belgium
  51. Veni Markovski for the Internet Society Bulgaria, Bulgaria
  52. Gérard Dantec for the Internet Society France, France
  53. Jan Willem Broekema for Internet Society, The Netherlands
  54. Marcin Cieślak for the Internet Society Poland, Poland
  55. Eamonn Wallace for IrelandOffline, Ireland
  56. Mark Kelly for the Irish Council for Civil Liberties, Ireland
  57. Markéta Nováková for Iuridicum Remedium, Czech Republic
  58. Milan Antonijevic for Koalicija za slobodu pristupa informacijama (Coalition for Free Access to Information), Serbia
  59. Elke Steven for the Komitee für Grundrechte und Demokratie, Germany
  60. Agata Szczerbiak for Krytyka Polityczna (Political Critic), Poland
  61. Jérémie Zimmermann for La Quadrature du Net, France
  62. Milan Antonijevic for Lawyers Commitee for Human Rights YUCOM, Serbia
  63. Klaus Jetz for Lesben- und Schwulenverband LSVD, Germany
  64. Isabella Sankey for Liberty (the National Council for Civil Liberties), UK
  65. Astrid Thienpont for Liga voor Mensenrechten (Human Rights League), Belgium
  66. Manuel Lambert for Ligue des droits de l’Homme (Human Rights League), Belgium
  67. Bardhyl Jashari for Metamorphosis Foundation, Macedonia
  68. Christian Bahls for MOGiS e.V., Germany
  69. Dennis Grabowski for naiin - no abuse in internet e.V., Germany
  70. Thomas Bruning for Nederlandse Vereniging van Journalisten, The Netherlands
  71. Harry Hummel for Netherlands Helsinki Committee, The Netherlands
  72. Albrecht Ude for netzwerk recherche e.V., Germany
  73. Christine Nordmann for Neue Richtervereinigung e.V., Germany
  74. Phil Booth for NO2ID, UK
  75. Jim Killock for Open Rights Group, UK
  76. Katarzyna Szymielewicz for Panoptykon Foundation, Poland
  77. Simon Davies for Privacy International, UK
  78. Mag. Georg Markus Kainz for q/uintessenz, Austria
  79. Christian Rickerts for Reporter ohne Grenzen e.V., Germany
  80. Jean Francois Julliard for Reporters Sans Frontières, international
  81. Carsten Gericke for Republikanischer Anwältinnen- und Anwälteverein e.V., Germany
  82. Walter van Holst for ScriptumLibre Foundation/Stichting Vrijschrift.org, The Netherlands
  83. Tony Bunyan for Statewatch, UK
  84. Janet de Jonge for Stichting Meldpunt Misbruik ID-plicht, The Netherlands
  85. Hans van der Giessen for the board of Stichting NBIP - Nationale Beheersorganisatie Internet Providers, The Netherlands
  86. Lars-Henrik Paarup Michelsen for Stopp Datalagringsdirektivet, Norway
  87. Paul Jansen for The dotindividual Foundation, The Netherlands
  88. Karin Ajaxon for the Julia Group, Sweden
  89. Bernadette Ségol for UNI europa, Belgium
  90. Frank Bsirske for United Services Union (ver.di - Vereinte Dienstleistungsgewerkschaft), Germany
  91. Dr. Carla Meyer for Verband der Freien Lektorinnen und Lektoren VFLL e.V., Germany
  92. Dr. Werner Weishaupt for Verband freier Psychotherapeuten, Heilpraktiker für Psychotherapie und Psychologischer Berater e.V., Germany
  93. Gerd Billen for Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband e.V., Germany
  94. Prof. Dr. Wulf Dietrich for Verein demokratischer Ärztinnen und Ärzte, Germany
  95. Anna Bauer for Vereinigung Demokratischer Juristinnen und Juristen e.V., Germany
  96. Arnout Veenman for the Vereniging ISPConnect Nederland, The Netherlands
  97. Miek Wijnberg for Vereniging Vrijbit, The Netherlands
  98. Daniel Jahre for Verein Linuxwochen, Austria
  99. Claudio Agosti for the Winston Smith Project, Italy

Background

More information on data retention