FAQ on the Right to be Forgotten: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
Zur Navigation springen
Zur Suche springen
K |
|||
(Eine dazwischenliegende Version desselben Benutzers wird nicht angezeigt) | |||
Zeile 1: | Zeile 1: | ||
− | '''Freedom not Fear 2014 - Saturday, 11:15-12:45''' | + | '''Freedom not Fear 2014 - Saturday, 27 September at 11:15-12:45''' |
''FAQ on the Right to be Forgotten'' | ''FAQ on the Right to be Forgotten'' | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Summary of the session == | ||
In May of this year, the Court of Justice of the European Union decided that individuals can – under certain conditions – ask Google to stop referring to information about them. This ruling has sparked an unprecedented debate about the balance between privacy and freedom of expression online. It has also left many questions unanswered. The aim of this session is to exchange of ideas on some of the key issues; such as: | In May of this year, the Court of Justice of the European Union decided that individuals can – under certain conditions – ask Google to stop referring to information about them. This ruling has sparked an unprecedented debate about the balance between privacy and freedom of expression online. It has also left many questions unanswered. The aim of this session is to exchange of ideas on some of the key issues; such as: | ||
Zeile 9: | Zeile 11: | ||
* How should search engines implement “the right to be forgotten” in practice? Should search results be removed globally or locally? | * How should search engines implement “the right to be forgotten” in practice? Should search results be removed globally or locally? | ||
* How can one minimise negative effects on the right to freedom of expression? What can we learn from the experience regarding copyright takedowns? | * How can one minimise negative effects on the right to freedom of expression? What can we learn from the experience regarding copyright takedowns? | ||
− | |||
This session will be moderated by B. Van Alsenoy, J. Ausloos and A. Kuczerawy from the Interdisciplinary Centre for Law and ICT (KU Leuven – ICRI/CIR – iMinds) | This session will be moderated by B. Van Alsenoy, J. Ausloos and A. Kuczerawy from the Interdisciplinary Centre for Law and ICT (KU Leuven – ICRI/CIR – iMinds) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Slides of the session== | ||
+ | |||
+ | * The slides can be found and downloaded over here: [http://www.law.kuleuven.be/icri/en/news/item/fnf2014-faqs-rtbf-20140928.pdf slides, pdf]. | ||
+ | * [Page of the KU Leuven http://www.law.kuleuven.be/icri/en/news/item/google] on the Google/Spain case including links to news, analysis and more. |
Aktuelle Version vom 29. September 2014, 10:49 Uhr
Freedom not Fear 2014 - Saturday, 27 September at 11:15-12:45
FAQ on the Right to be Forgotten
Summary of the session
In May of this year, the Court of Justice of the European Union decided that individuals can – under certain conditions – ask Google to stop referring to information about them. This ruling has sparked an unprecedented debate about the balance between privacy and freedom of expression online. It has also left many questions unanswered. The aim of this session is to exchange of ideas on some of the key issues; such as:
- When should a person (not) have a right to have search results removed?
- How should search engines balance the privacy of an individual against the public’s right to know?
- How should search engines implement “the right to be forgotten” in practice? Should search results be removed globally or locally?
- How can one minimise negative effects on the right to freedom of expression? What can we learn from the experience regarding copyright takedowns?
This session will be moderated by B. Van Alsenoy, J. Ausloos and A. Kuczerawy from the Interdisciplinary Centre for Law and ICT (KU Leuven – ICRI/CIR – iMinds)
Slides of the session
- The slides can be found and downloaded over here: slides, pdf.
- [Page of the KU Leuven http://www.law.kuleuven.be/icri/en/news/item/google] on the Google/Spain case including links to news, analysis and more.